The Nonexistent Knight

For such a short work this Italo Calvino novella is rather rich in themes which can result in great discussions.

First, the entire tale is being written by a cloistered nun as an act of penance, ostensibly being translated from a very obscure old work. The narrative structure starts each chapter with the thoughts of the nun about the suitability of her writing about courtly love, or knights in armor, or violent battles and gory corpses. Along the way the nun has plenty of opportunity to make comments on the construction of fiction, sort of a writer’s manual.

But the story is about a nonexistent knight, a paladin in liege to Charlemagne who wears immaculate white armor but never takes it off because there’s actually no one inside the armor. Agilulf, the nonexistent knight, is identified with the best parts of being a knight—piety, faithfulness, chivalry. Since this novella has been interpreted as a satire on modern life, does that make Aigilulf the corporate man, the loyal worker, or maybe robo-cop?

The quest, which is required in this type of literature, is to find the daughter of the Scottish King and prove or disprove her virginity, which will then suggest the birthrights of a knight or two. In several complex suppositions, one knight is deemed to have the entire Knights of the Holy Grail as his father. But when he gets to a village in the north of France, he finds that the villagers have nothing and they explain that the Knights in the forest (later identified as the Holy Grail knights) regularly come to town and take the food and other provisions for themselves.

When the Knights of the Holy Grail again descend on the village, they are told there is nothing for them, so the Knights attack the villagers and Torrismund (the questing knight) bands with the villagers, commands the defense, and defeats the Knights. Sounds a lot like The Magnificent Seven (or The Seven Samurai) right? What we learn is that the Knights are so focused on the Holy Grail they will do anything to maintain that focus:  illegally take provisions, leave peasants to starve, attack weaponless peasants with swords and lances, burn down villages, etc. I can think of two analogues for this story:  the first is the spread of Christianity which often saved the soul of a non-believers by burning them at the stake; the other is more contemporary and political, not religious. Can you think of a political entity that will steal from the common people to make the rich richer, who will subvert the common good claiming it is bad to help those who need help, who would rather see people suffer and die if it is in line with their ideology, and who prefer a bald-faced lie to the truth if it is not in accordance with their ideology? Is an unwavering focus on an ideology one of the things Calvino is warning against in his tale of the Knights of the Holy Grail?

Calvino died in 1985, right in the middle of the Reagan revolution that kicked off the rapid decline of the United States. Was Calvino prescient?

5 thoughts on “The Nonexistent Knight

  1. The fact that Maggie Thatcher and Reagan were pals, says it all for me. She single handedly dismantled our industries, thought we could live off “Service Industries” , didn’t believe in society and although a woman did nothing to improve women’s log in the UK. We are still living with the disastrous results. Mrs May admires Thatcher, the stupid mare! As for Reagan, he sems to have started the process of impoverishment of public life that resulted in the present frightful situation in the US.


    1. True. Do you think we should hurry-up and read as much dystopian literature as we can, hoping to garner options for living in the world contending with a fascist America (assuming the world hasn’t been incinerated before we can respond)?


      1. That’s a good idea, although reading the news is almost enough dystopia to overload the average Brit. What with the EU wanting yet more billions before we go and Trump rattling his sabre and puffing his chest it’s enough to drive one up the pole.


  2. I just wanted to point out that (although I agree Regan was a catalyst the decline of the US) Italo Calvino wrote the book in the early 60’s, and not 1985 like your article says. I will look further into this when I have the time to confirm it though because I read this elsewhere and therefore its 2nd hand information.


    1. You misread my statement which did not say that Calvino wrote The Nonexistent Knight in 1985 but rather, “Calvino died in 1985, right in the middle of the Reagan revolution that kicked off the rapid decline of the United States. Was Calvino prescient?” The speculation being that Calvino, back in the 1960s, foresaw the coming disaster which was Ronald Reagan.


What are your thoughts on this?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s